Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-httpbis-07-00: (with COMMENT)

[Mark Nottingham]

Hi Mirja,

First an editorial one: should it be "HTTP/2 Revision" instead of "HTTP/1.1
Revision", or maybe just "HTTP Revision(s)"?

The documents that refers to are the HTTP/1.1 document set, although many of them will emerge as just "HTTP...".

Then regarding the HTTP and QUIC part. I found it a bit weird and probably also
unecessary to mention review intentions in the charter.

They're mentioned in the QUIC charter, so it seemed good to mirror them here.

However, I guess we
need at some point to discuss what to do with HTTP/3 after the QUIC group has
finsihed their mapping document. Is the intention to do another re-charter
then? Should we then maybe just wait until we have a better plan before we say
anything about this in ther httpbis charter?

The chairs discussed this and I thought we'd agreed on some text, but I see that hasn't made it into datatracker; Alexey?

The timing doesn't seem to be
optional for me here but I assume the recharter is coming up because H2 is
basically done...?

We realised that the charter was pretty out-of-date, and this initiated before we had the discussion about maintenance of the QUIC HTTP documents.


Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/

[Alexey Melnikov]

Post by Mark Nottingham
Hi Mirja,

First an editorial one: should it be "HTTP/2 Revision" instead of "HTTP/1.1
Revision", or maybe just "HTTP Revision(s)"?

The documents that refers to are the HTTP/1.1 document set, although
many of them will emerge as just "HTTP...".

Then regarding the HTTP and QUIC part. I found it a bit weird and probably also
unecessary to mention review intentions in the charter.

They're mentioned in the QUIC charter, so it seemed good to mirror them here.

However, I guess we
need at some point to discuss what to do with HTTP/3 after the QUIC group has
finsihed their mapping document. Is the intention to do another re-charter
then? Should we then maybe just wait until we have a better plan before we say
anything about this in ther httpbis charter?

The chairs discussed this and I thought we'd agreed on some text, but I
see that hasn't made it into datatracker; Alexey?

I have updated the charter since. Mirja, can you double check charter-ietf-httpbis-07-01?

Post by Mark Nottingham

The timing doesn't seem to be
optional for me here but I assume the recharter is coming up because H2 is
basically done...?

We realised that the charter was pretty out-of-date, and this initiated
before we had the discussion about maintenance of the QUIC HTTP
documents.